Likely worth it. Reviews lean strongly positive.
It's free to play.
- Multiplayer: 15 reviews raised it, mostly praise
- Graphics: 14 reviews raised it, mostly praise
- Combat: 12 reviews raised it, mostly praise
- Bugs: 13 reviews raised it, mostly criticism
Based on 1k player reviews · updated 6 days ago
What players think
The recurring themes across 300 analysed reviews: what players praise, what divides them, and what to know.
As a "toon" focus, maybe the physics are meant to be a bit wobbly, and with multiplayer can be funny and fun at the same time.
What I like: I like the graphics, the ability to jump well (just not for so long each jump), the aiming is great, animations, coins for whatever perks etc will come (great focus for long term play), ability to auto-pick up ammo if same weapon, UI and stats/saving.
its an solid game but it needs optimization it doesnt look good but it runs under 30 fps also i remember that you could use 2 weapons at the same time which is an very fun mechanic and i would love to see it come back (example- holding 2 ars at the same time)
its an solid game but it needs optimization it doesnt look good but it runs under 30 fps also i remember that you could use 2 weapons at the same time which is an very fun mechanic and i would love to see it come back (example- holding 2 ars at the same time)
Theme by theme
Every theme is scored by what reviewers actually said about it, not just whether they recommended the game.
Ranked by how many sampled reviews mention each topic. A topic sits in a column by what reviewers said about that topic; the percentage beside it is how many of them recommended the game anyway. 2 more themes were each raised by fewer than 6 sampled reviews and are not shown.
The data behind the verdict
For the players who want the receipts.
We’ll surface hours-played once playtime ingestion ships.
If you liked this one
Reviewed games that overlap most with this one.


