Worth it for the right player.
It's free to play.
- Graphics: 30 reviews raised it, mostly praise
- Gameplay: 24 reviews raised it, mostly praise
- Servers and matchmaking: 17 reviews raised it, mostly praise
- Combat: 32 reviews raised it, mostly criticism
- Performance: 7 reviews raised it, mostly criticism
Based on 549 player reviews · updated 6 days ago
What players think
The recurring themes across 300 analysed reviews: what players praise, what divides them, and what to know.
Optimization and graphics options are slightly lacking and my 1050 card can sometimes struggle, but such is expected in early access.
It remains a quite pretty but is more like a technical demo or walking simulator than having much real gameplay.
So if you dont know "what to do" you mostly end up exploring a bit or just wait in the base...or just log off and come back later if you play on a online community server (so yea, you learn also stuff if youre not playing if youre on a community server).
The simulated battles are the most exciting part but it doesn't mention you can play these co-op.
-Poorly optimized explosion effects causing matches to grind to a halt regardless of computer specifications.
Theme by theme
Every theme is scored by what reviewers actually said about it, not just whether they recommended the game.
Ranked by how many sampled reviews mention each topic. A topic sits in a column by what reviewers said about that topic; the percentage beside it is how many of them recommended the game anyway.
The data behind the verdict
For the players who want the receipts.
We’ll surface hours-played once playtime ingestion ships.
If you liked this one
Reviewed games that overlap most with this one.

