Reviews look positive, but there are only a few so far.
It's free to play.
- Gameplay: 12 reviews raised it, mostly praise
- Graphics: 10 reviews raised it, mostly praise
- Difficulty: 10 reviews raised it, mostly praise
- Crashes: 19 reviews raised it, mostly criticism
- Bugs: 8 reviews raised it, mostly criticism
Based on 204 player reviews · updated 6 days ago
What players think
The recurring themes across 146 analysed reviews: what players praise, what divides them, and what to know.
But the gameplay is very solid.
I can run real-like graphics like Snow-runner at high above 60 FPS, yet this runs on lowest settings below 30 FPS constantly and gets worse with exploring the map (which is mostly barren)
As for my recommendation (if you want to skip the whole critique - some points for developer on ideas to make it easier to modify difficulty), I would optimistically say hold off a bit for balancing and bug fixes, but if the major two items are fixed (points with *), then the only thing this game may need is optimization and some additional buildings/techs.
Overall very promising, I can't wait for an optimization pass to be done so I can play the rest of the game.
The interface occasionally lacks the refinement seen in more established city builders, and some features would benefit from additional tutorials or guidance.
Theme by theme
Every theme is scored by what reviewers actually said about it, not just whether they recommended the game.
Ranked by how many sampled reviews mention each topic. A topic sits in a column by what reviewers said about that topic; the percentage beside it is how many of them recommended the game anyway.
The data behind the verdict
For the players who want the receipts.
We’ll surface hours-played once playtime ingestion ships.
If you liked this one
Reviewed games that overlap most with this one.
No recommendations for this game yet.
This game doesn’t overlap enough with games Crit has reviewed.