Yes, worth playing.
It's free to play.
- Controls: 28 reviews raised it, mostly praise
- Graphics: 28 reviews raised it, mostly praise
- Multiplayer: 24 reviews raised it, mostly praise
- Crashes: 25 reviews raised it, mostly criticism
- Bugs: 8 reviews raised it, mostly criticism
Based on 41k player reviews · updated 4 days ago
What players think
The recurring themes across 300 analysed reviews: what players praise, what divides them, and what to know.
VR, hand controller from VR, haptic seats, seemingly has no internal limit on the number of devices/controllers you can attach, supports DLSS/DLAA and will support Vulkan in the nearish future
It is the same scenario as before, only in 1944, with changed textures and buildings typical of Asia, as well as prefabricated WWII positions.
You can pvp with them and they're quite fun.
More than 10 years spend with this game, on and off and nothing has changed, beside graphics, same empty sandbox with the same bad ai, same bad dmg models, same broken spotting mechanics, unplayable multiplayer crashing all the time but now sugar coated in visual garbage with half baked modules pushed insted of taking time in fixing the engine and making something that players can do in game like dynamic campaign.
The game is very well optimized for being a heavily graphical game, I'm running very entry level laptop hardware and ranging anywhere between 40-70 FPS depending on the scenario.
Achieving a smooth experience often requires powerful hardware and careful optimization.
Theme by theme
Every theme is scored by what reviewers actually said about it, not just whether they recommended the game.
Ranked by how many sampled reviews mention each topic. A topic sits in a column by what reviewers said about that topic; the percentage beside it is how many of them recommended the game anyway.
The data behind the verdict
For the players who want the receipts.
We’ll surface hours-played once playtime ingestion ships.
If you liked this one
Reviewed games that overlap most with this one.



